Who Really Owns the Security Questionnaire? Solving Sales Drag

Feb 6, 2026

by

Ben

Wetzell

by

Ben

Wetzell

The Hidden Deal Killer in Your Sales Pipeline

You are at the finish line. The verbal 'yes' is secured. The procurement team is ready to move. Then, the email arrives: a 250-row Excel sheet titled 'Vendor Security Assessment.' Progress stops. For many Business-to-Business (B2B) teams, the Security Questionnaire (SQ) is the ultimate bottleneck. It is a dense, high-stakes document that asks about data encryption, SOC2 (Service Organization Control Type 2) compliance, and disaster recovery. Because these documents are complex, they often sit in an inbox for days while stakeholders argue over who should fill them out.

The Ownership Gap: Sales vs. IT vs. Security

The core problem is that no one wants to own the Security Questionnaire. Sales teams see it as a technical hurdle that prevents them from hitting their Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Meanwhile, IT and Security teams view it as an interruption to their core work of protecting the infrastructure. When ownership is unclear, the document bounces back and forth, adding an average of 40% more time to the total sales cycle. This delay is more than just an annoyance; it is a revenue leak. Research shows that deal momentum drops significantly every day a proposal remains unsigned.

Why Your Current Process is Broken

Most mid-market and enterprise teams rely on 'tribal knowledge.' When a new Request for Proposal (RFP) or security audit comes in, the sales person pings a developer on Slack. The developer searches their sent folder for an old email. This manual hunting leads to inconsistent answers and high stress. It also prevents small teams from competing with larger incumbents who have dedicated proposal departments.

Tools like Settle help automate this process by providing a Centralized Proposal Knowledge Base. Imagine having every SOC2 answer and technical spec indexed and ready for retrieval. Instead of starting from a blank spreadsheet, your team starts with a 90% completed draft.

Steps to Reclaim Your Time

To break the bottleneck, you must shift from a reactive to a proactive stance. First, designate a 'Process Owner'—usually a Sales Operations or RevOps (Revenue Operations) lead—who coordinates the document. Second, empower them with a Library of truth. This Library serves as a repository for PDF, Word, and spreadsheet data from past successful bids. By using Settle’s AI drafting capabilities, you can reduce response time by 80%, allowing your technical experts to focus on a final 'Enterprise-Grade Collaboration' review rather than clerical data entry. When automation handles the repetitive 80% of the work, your team gains a massive competitive advantage, responding to complex bids at a scale previously reserved for giant corporations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary cause of a security questionnaire bottleneck?

The bottleneck is primarily caused by a lack of centralized knowledge and unclear departmental ownership. When technical data is scattered across personal hard drives and old email threads, it takes a 50-person team significantly longer to consolidate answers, often adding 10-14 days to a deal's closing time. Establishing a single source of truth for all security responses allows the process to move from a multi-week ordeal to a 48-hour turn-around.

Should Sales or IT own the security questionnaire process?

While the Sales team has the most at stake regarding the deal's timeline, the Information Technology (IT) or Security team must own the accuracy of the data. A successful model involves the Sales or RevOps team owning the workflow and 'Proposal Assistant' tools, while the technical team acts as the final approver for the content stored in the Library. This separation of duties ensures that responses are both fast and technically accurate without burning out developers.

How can AI reduce the time spent on security questionnaires?

AI reduces the time by performing semantic lookups across a historical database of previously approved answers to generate instant drafts. Instead of manually typing out a company's data encryption policy for the hundredth time, an AI-powered tool like Settle can auto-draft the response based on your SOC2 documentation or past RFPs. This reduces the manual labor involved by approximately 80%, allowing teams to handle a higher volume of questionnaires without increasing headcount.

Why is a central knowledge base critical for security responses?

A Centralized Proposal Knowledge Base ensures that every team member is using the most current and approved version of a technical answer. Without one, teams risk submitting outdated security information which can lead to failed audits or legal liability during the procurement phase. A centralized repository also tracks metadata, such as who last edited a technical response, providing an audit trail that is essential for enterprise-grade compliance.

How do security questionnaires impact the overall sales pipeline?

Security questionnaires often act as a 'silent' stage in the pipeline that is frequently underestimated in sales forecasts. If a company processes 20 large bids a year and each takes 15 hours of manual work, that is 300 hours of high-value technical labor lost to administrative tasks. Automating this phase with software like Settle doesn't just save time; it increases the velocity of the entire pipeline, allowing for more aggressive RFP Discovery and higher revenue growth.

Learn more about RFP automation

Learn more about RFP automation

BG

Submit your next proposal, within 48 hours or less

Stay ahead with the latest advancement in proposal automation.

BG

Submit your next proposal, within 48 hours or less

Stay ahead with the latest advancement in proposal automation.

BG

Submit your next proposal, within 48 hours or less

Stay ahead with the latest advancement in proposal automation.