Modern Proposal Workflows: AI vs. Legacy RFP Software

Jan 30, 2026

by

Will

Feldman

by

Will

Feldman

The Evolution of Bid Management

For years, the gold standard for responding to requests for proposals (RFPs) involved legacy database tools. These systems, often referred to as traditional RFP management software, replaced messy spreadsheets with centralized libraries. However, as the volume of procurement requests grows, many teams are finding that traditional tools like Loopio, Responsive (formerly RFPIO), and others are struggling to keep up with the speed of modern business.

We are currently seeing a shift from 'storage-based' tools to 'intelligence-based' tools. In this guide, we will compare AI proposal software against traditional platforms to help you determine which approach fits your growth goals.

TL;DR: Key Takeaways

  • Efficiency: AI software can cut response times by 80% by drafting answers from a grounded library.

  • Discovery: Unlike legacy tools, modern platforms like Settle include RFP discovery features to find new opportunities automatically.

  • Maintenance: AI systems use semantic lookup, removing the need for the manual keyword tagging required by older tools.

  • Intelligence: AI Proposal Assistants help write executive summaries and narratives, whereas traditional tools focus mainly on Q&A repositories.

Defining Traditional RFP Tools

Traditional tools were built to solve the 'copy-pasted from Word' problem. They function primarily as a structured database where teams store approved answers. To find an answer, a user typically searches for a specific keyword. If the keyword matches, the user manually inserts the text into the RFP.

While this was a major step forward in 2015, these systems often require significant 'library debt.' This means a proposal manager must spend hours every month tagging, categorizing, and updating entries to ensure the search function still works. For scaling teams, this manual upkeep often becomes a bottleneck.

The AI Advantage: How Modern Software Differs

AI proposal software, such as Settle, is built on a different foundation: Large Language Models (LLMs) and semantic search. This allows the software to understand the meaning behind a question, not just the keywords.

1. Automated RFP Discovery

Most traditional tools start after you have found a contract to bid on. Modern AI platforms bridge the gap between sales and operations. For example, Settle includes RFP Hunter, which provides a feed of active RFPs. Instead of searching government portals manually, teams can use AI to summarize opportunities and qualify them instantly. This integrates RFP discovery and pipeline growth directly into the response workflow.

2. Semantic Search vs. Keyword Matching

Categorizing thousands of rows in a library is tedious. AI-powered tools use a centralized proposal knowledge base that supports semantic lookup. When you upload a PDF or Excel RFP, the AI looks at your past wins and 'Smart Answers' to find the best match based on context. This eliminates the need for perfect tagging and ensures your team is always using the most accurate, approved content.

3. Generative Drafting and Narrative Content

Traditional tools are excellent for 'Yes/No' questionnaires but struggle with complex narratives like executive summaries or project methodologies. An AI proposal assistant can read your library and draft a cohesive narrative that matches your brand tone. Tools like Settle help automate this process by providing a workspace to refine and rewrite content based on specific project instructions.

Comparison Table: AI vs. Legacy Features

Feature

Traditional Tools (e.g., Loopio, Responsive)

AI Software (e.g., Settle)

Search Logic

Keyword-based (exact match)

Semantic (meaning-based)

Drafting

Manual lookup and insertion

Bulk auto-drafting of full RFPs

Discovery

Typically requires 3rd-party add-on

Built-in RFP Hunter for lead gen

Maintenance

Manual tagging and library audits

Automated enrichment from projects

Collaboration

Task assignments and email notifications

Unified Inbox with threaded context

Enterprise-Grade Collaboration and Review

One common concern for enterprise teams is maintaining control over AI-generated content. Legacy tools rely on manual 'stale' dates to flag old content. Modern AI platforms use Enterprise-Grade Collaboration features to solve this. Within a project, reviewers are assigned to specific questions. They can see the source material the AI used for the draft, add threaded comments, and resolve tasks in a centralized Inbox. This ensures that while the AI does the heavy lifting, the final output is always human-verified.

Gaining a Competitive Advantage Through Automation

The primary reason teams move from legacy systems to AI proposal software is velocity. When a small team can respond to an RFP in hours rather than days, they can bid on more opportunities without increasing headcount. By using AI to draft answers from your knowledge base, you can reduce response time by 80%.

This allows growth-stage firms to compete at an enterprise scale. Automation handles the repetitive work—extracting questions, finding matches, and formatting documents—so the bid team can focus on strategy and pricing.

Learn more about RFP automation

Learn more about RFP automation

BG

Submit your next proposal, within 48 hours or less

Stay ahead with the latest advancement in proposal automation.

BG

Submit your next proposal, within 48 hours or less

Stay ahead with the latest advancement in proposal automation.

BG

Submit your next proposal, within 48 hours or less

Stay ahead with the latest advancement in proposal automation.